Fighting Between U.S. and Iran-Backed Militias Escalates in Syria
Two strikes on U.S. military sites have been tied to forces aligned with Iran, raising tensions just as Washington appears close to striking a new nuclear deal with Tehran.
American forces patrolling in Syria’s northeastern Hasakeh Province in May.Credit...Delil Souleiman/Agence France-Presse — Getty ImagesSenior U.S. officials said the Aug. 15 attacks on the two U.S. bases in Syria could have been an Iranian attempt to avenge a previous Israeli attack by targeting Israel’s U.S. allies. But Iran denied any connection to the groups in Syria.The drone attack, on the U.S. base at al-Tanf, near the border in south Syria, came a day after Israel struck military targets in the Syrian provinces of Damascus and Tartus, killing three Syrian soldiers. Those strikes targeted a Syrian army air defense base where Iran-backed fighters are often stationed, according to the British-based monitoring group Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.
TURKEY
HASAKEH
SYRIA
Deir al-Zour
TARTUS
LEB.
al-Tanf base
Damascus
IRAQ
100 MILES
The new fighting comes at a very delicate moment in U.S.-Iran relations, as both sides are moving closer to agreeing on a revived nuclear deal that would lift sanctions on Iran in return for limits on its nuclear activities. Given that, any attacks that cause a large number of casualties on either side risk throwing the nuclear negotiations off course.However, U.S. officials insisted there is no connection between the strikes in Syria and the nuclear negotiations. Other observers have wondered whether the attacks by forces allied with Tehran could be an effort by Iranian hard-liners to disrupt any deal.Some Iranian analysts said they viewed the U.S. attacks as the Biden administration’s attempt to appease critics of the nuclear deal and demonstrate that it would maintain a tough stance against Iran even if a nuclear deal was reached.The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps is a powerful arm of Iran’s armed forces that operates in parallel with the military. It is tasked with securing Iran’s borders, and its overseas branch, the Quds Force, carries out operations across the Middle East and beyond and trains and arms Shiite proxy militias that operate in a number of countries. The U.S. has designated it as a terrorist group, which became a point of contention in the negotiations to revive the nuclear deal.A senior U.S. official said there were several possible motives for Iran’s Aug. 15 attack. It could be a response to an Israeli strike or a new commander, said the official, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive security issues. But the use of drones pointed clearly to the involvement of the Revolutionary Guards.Iran has built increasingly sophisticated weapons-capabledronesin recent years. It has both sold them commercially to other nations and stepped up their transfer to proxy groups.The advancement of Iran’s drone capabilities, as well as their use in Arab states and against oil facilities in the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, has helped lead to a militarypartnershipbetween Israel, several Arab militaries and the United States.What we consider before using anonymous sources.How do the sources know the information? What’s their motivation for telling us? Have they proved reliable in the past? Can we corroborate the information? Even with these questions satisfied, The Times uses anonymous sources as a last resort. The reporter and at least one editor know the identity of the source.About a year ago, an Iranian-led alliance opposed to Israel met virtually to discuss how to respond to increasing Israeli attacks inside Syria, according to Gheis Ghoreishi, an analyst close to Iran’s government with knowledge of the Revolutionary Guards’ strategy in the region. It brought together military experts from Syria, Iraq, the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, Yemen and Iran’s Quds forces — the overseas arm of the Revolutionary Guards.During their discussions, the Syrians said they did not want attacks against Israel to be launched from their territory so as not to risk an all-out war at a time when the country is already weakened. So the alliance decided instead to retaliate for the Israeli strikes by hitting American bases in Syria, hoping that Washington would then pressure Israel to back off Iran.For years, Israel and Iran have fought aclandestinewar across the Middle East, and limited tit-for-tat attacks have recently escalated and expanded to include strikes on land, in the air and most recently, at sea.
Image
The al-Tanf military outpost in southern Syria was attacked by Iranian-backed fighters on Aug. 15Credit...Lolita Baldor/Associate PressThe military experts at the meeting also concluded that although the U.S. military out-powered the proxy groups in Syria and would likely counterattack, the Biden administration policy was aimed at defusing tensions in the region and it sought to avoid starting any new war at a time when Washington’s attention was shifting away from the Middle East.The meeting participants decided that for each Israeli strike on an Iranian target in Syria, there would be a retaliatory strike against a U.S. base there, and particularlyal-Tanf.“Iran’s focus on al-Tanf is because they consider it a troublesome spot for them,” said Omar Abu Layla, executive director of Deir Ezzor 24, a news and analysis organization that focuses on Syria’s eastern province of Deir al-Zour. “They want to expand their military influence on that area entirely.”Drone and rocket attacks on U.S. military bases in Syria have recently gained pace.Last year in October, Iranian proxy forces launched fivedronesloaded with ball bearings and shrapnel at al-Tanf base. American and Israeli officials at the time said the drone attack was the first time Iran had directed a strike against the U.S. in response to an attack by Israel.Iran did not claim responsibility for the drone strike, but a Telegram channel run by affiliates of the Revolutionary Guards said it was in response to the U.S. allowing Israeli attacks on Iranian-allied forces in eastern Syria.Iran’s involvement in Syria and the Revolutionary Guards presence dates back to 2011, when the Guards sent fighters and generals to help Syrian President Bashar al-Assad crush the 2011 Arab Spring uprising and prevail in the prolonged civil war that grew out of the revolt.With Mr. Assad having emerged from more than a decade of conflict largely victorious and in control of most of the country, Iranian forces and tens of thousands of its proxy fighters from countries like Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan have remained in Syria as part of a broader regional policy of maintaining a threat to Israel in a state that shares a border.“Iran’s winning card is that it now neighbors Israel through Syria as well,” said Mr. Ghoreishi.Since then, Iran and its proxies have entrenched themselves in parts of Syria, especially in the east and around the capital, Damascus. They have built military infrastructure, bought real estate, recruited local fighters and attempted to spread Shiite Islam there. U.S. officials said there are a relatively small number of Revolutionary Guards commanders remaining in Syria, running the allied militias made up of Syrian, Iraqi or Afghan fighters.The U.S. strikes this week began on Tuesday night when fighter jets dropped guided bombs on about a dozen ammunition depots used by militant groups affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards in Deir al-Zour. U.S. officials said they didn’t want to spark a tit-for-tat escalation, so they made sure there were no militants at the depots when they struck to reduce the risk ofcasualties.But the next day, a militia overseen by the Revolutionary Guards retaliated by attacking two U.S. outposts in Syria—Mission Support Site Conoco in northeast Syria and Green Village.The U.S. military responded with AC-130 gunships and Apache attack helicopters, killing four militants.“Now we believe, based on the intelligence, that we’ve re-established deterrence,” said Col. Joseph Buccino, a spokesman for the U.S. Central Command. “We believe this back and forth has culminated.”
0 Comments